[Oriya-group] My Point of View on Font issue

[Manik]

Sorry, you got it otherwise.

Prev >
Prev >states that ''ABARGYA BARGA... SWARA DHWANIRE PHALAA LEKHIBA
Prev >ZUKTIZUKTA NUHEN''....
Prev >
It writes that giving a phala to a swar is not rational. U is given a phala
that is ba and this becomes wa.

Talking about ya this jyuktijyuktata is not applicable because in ya there
is no occasion for a phala. However, the description is elsewhere. 

It is also written that to correctly represent foreign text such a
representation is necessary. Please refer to the scan.

Prev >are ABRGYA (means non-grouped) characters.
Prev >These are also called Ardha-Swara or Ardha-vyanjana or Dwi-Swara.
Prev >
Prev >So, according to above statement these also should not have a Phalla
Prev >form??

You got these otherwise. Pl. refer to the scan.

Some other reference: All Avargyas are not ardhswara. Some avargyas raised
by you:

Prev >YA = vowel 'i'+'a'
Yes! Ya is a ardhswara or ardhvyanjan it goes from ee to a.

Prev >Ra = vowel vocalic 'R'+'a'
R is produced by jiwha with vartsya and a vibration so it is a kampit,
lodith or lunthith dhwani.

Prev >La = vowel vocalic 'LL'+'a'
La is a parswik dhwani coz jiwha with vartsya gets asmlagna.

Prev >Wa = vowel vocalic 'u'+'a'
Described earlier.

Hopefully I make it clearer now.

Prev >May I seek Kind reply in clarification from the writer of the book or 
Such a possibility will arise eventually when I, Mr. Gora and Pansaribabu
you along with some other will surely go and visit Mr. Mohapatra, the author
of the book. However I don't think the time is ripe now, Even Mr. Gora is
also not married and it may take longer for us to get ripe enough. Just
jokin!

Regards,
Manik Chand Patnaik.